Difference between revisions of "Talk:Attraction Rate"
From MHWiki
Camomiletea (talk | contribs) (some data) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::I think poor <60%, but I'm not sure. Need lots of logs to verify that, though. [[User:Shinnok|Shinnok]] 11:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC) | ::I think poor <60%, but I'm not sure. Need lots of logs to verify that, though. [[User:Shinnok|Shinnok]] 11:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::From my log, the highest attraction rate I had that was still ''poor'' was 54.7%, and the lowest ''decent'' was 59.2%, so my guess is that it changes from poor to decent at around 55%. The lowest ''good'' I had was 77.6% and the highest was 88.7%, and I didn't have any ''very good'' yet - so I don't think I can come to any conclusions based on this data. Except that 77.6% is still good, not decent. [[User:Camomiletea|Camomiletea]] 17:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:53, 24 February 2009
More info needed
This page could use more info to justify it being a page of its own. -- B.Rossow talkcontr 19:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- Did a proper writeup for the page. There's still a few things I haven't added though, which I'll get to when I next remember this page exists :D
- I'm also in need of Attraction Rate details, mainly what % returns what message, although for a start I'm fairly certain that Poor < 65%, Decent < 80%, Good < 90%, Very Good < 95-98%, Almost Perfect < 100%, Perfect = 100%.
- I think poor <60%, but I'm not sure. Need lots of logs to verify that, though. Shinnok 11:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- From my log, the highest attraction rate I had that was still poor was 54.7%, and the lowest decent was 59.2%, so my guess is that it changes from poor to decent at around 55%. The lowest good I had was 77.6% and the highest was 88.7%, and I didn't have any very good yet - so I don't think I can come to any conclusions based on this data. Except that 77.6% is still good, not decent. Camomiletea 17:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
