Difference between revisions of "Talk:Catacombs"
Chong McBong (talk | contribs) (reply) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Until they say there's an area called the catacombs, we don't know what they mean. That's why I said it's suggested; there's been no official announcement of any catacombs and it could be a name that doesn't actually refer to any area we see. | Until they say there's an area called the catacombs, we don't know what they mean. That's why I said it's suggested; there's been no official announcement of any catacombs and it could be a name that doesn't actually refer to any area we see. | ||
Hence the disclaimer- MHWiki does not generally support heavy rumormongering, and we don't have enough solid fact for it to be much more than that.--[[User:Kirbix|Kirbix]] 21:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | Hence the disclaimer- MHWiki does not generally support heavy rumormongering, and we don't have enough solid fact for it to be much more than that.--[[User:Kirbix|Kirbix]] 21:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :good point :) --[[User:Chong McBong|Chong McBong]] 21:29, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:29, 29 January 2009
I realize there's no catacombs announced yet; however, it's suggested, and having this page here will at least help those who are excited and confused and come to the wiki in search of answers.
Perhaps a disclaimer at the top warning that none of this is verified and is merely speculation- I'm sure that the readers would appreciate the mere fact that there's some sort of news here.--Kirbix 21:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
it is verified.
go to the help section of the trapsmith, it explains that it is the catacombs and the new power type is arcane--Chong McBong 21:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Until they say there's an area called the catacombs, we don't know what they mean. That's why I said it's suggested; there's been no official announcement of any catacombs and it could be a name that doesn't actually refer to any area we see. Hence the disclaimer- MHWiki does not generally support heavy rumormongering, and we don't have enough solid fact for it to be much more than that.--Kirbix 21:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- good point :) --Chong McBong 21:29, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
