Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hunting group"
From MHWiki
m (reply) |
(→Rank question) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Rank makes zero difference. That would essentially defeat the purpose of the hunting group for most highly ranked players. I can sound the horn for others in my party of lesser rank and vice versa. Just look at my log (or anyone;s, really) for verification. --<span style="border:2px ridge #aaf;background-color:#fff;padding:1px 8px;font:normal 10px Verdana,sans-serif;margin-left:-8px;">[[User:Brossow|<span style="color:#358;">B.Rossow</span>]] · [[User_talk:Brossow|<span style="color:#35d;">talk</span>]]</span> 06:35, 13 December 2009 (UTC) | :Rank makes zero difference. That would essentially defeat the purpose of the hunting group for most highly ranked players. I can sound the horn for others in my party of lesser rank and vice versa. Just look at my log (or anyone;s, really) for verification. --<span style="border:2px ridge #aaf;background-color:#fff;padding:1px 8px;font:normal 10px Verdana,sans-serif;margin-left:-8px;">[[User:Brossow|<span style="color:#358;">B.Rossow</span>]] · [[User_talk:Brossow|<span style="color:#35d;">talk</span>]]</span> 06:35, 13 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is as I thought then. At some time was this not the case or was this article just plain incorrect in the past? --[[User:Niehusa|Niehusa]] 11:37, 13 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:37, 13 December 2009
Rank question
The previous version had some kind of reference that the people in your hunting group needed to be at your same rank to be brought along for the hunt with you. Is this supposed to be same rank or higher? I know this to not be so, I have lower ranked friends that can blow my horn for me.
- Rank makes zero difference. That would essentially defeat the purpose of the hunting group for most highly ranked players. I can sound the horn for others in my party of lesser rank and vice versa. Just look at my log (or anyone;s, really) for verification. --B.Rossow · talk 06:35, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
It is as I thought then. At some time was this not the case or was this article just plain incorrect in the past? --Niehusa 11:37, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
