Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mice"

From MHWiki
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Ratings==
 
Just noticing a trend in mouse descriptions saying "they are considered <blank> to catch" where blank is effortless, challenging, etc.
 
Just noticing a trend in mouse descriptions saying "they are considered <blank> to catch" where blank is effortless, challenging, etc.
 
The difficulty rating is relative to each trap setup so perhaps it is best to not include the difficulty rating in the generic description of the mice.
 
The difficulty rating is relative to each trap setup so perhaps it is best to not include the difficulty rating in the generic description of the mice.
Line 6: Line 7:
  
 
Let's not list suggested mice or "unofficial" mice here please.
 
Let's not list suggested mice or "unofficial" mice here please.
 +
 
==Table==
 
==Table==
 
Maybe we should list the mice in a sortable table? --[[User:Navarr|Navarr]] 04:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 
Maybe we should list the mice in a sortable table? --[[User:Navarr|Navarr]] 04:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:12, 1 December 2008

Ratings

Just noticing a trend in mouse descriptions saying "they are considered <blank> to catch" where blank is effortless, challenging, etc. The difficulty rating is relative to each trap setup so perhaps it is best to not include the difficulty rating in the generic description of the mice. --Dave Vanderburg 21:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Update: I've edited nearly all of the mice to remove the difficulty listed (as it is trap-dependent) and add the max point value. Mice that still need point values added to their page: Leprechaun, and Mobster. Matt Johns 20:43, 16 October 2008 (EST).

Let's not list suggested mice or "unofficial" mice here please.

Table

Maybe we should list the mice in a sortable table? --Navarr 04:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


Categories

Just threw the mice into regional categories (Gnawnia, Burroughs and Furoma), according to the MouseHunt lists. So, the articles probably only need to mention locations from now on. Revengeance 18:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Oops

All of the minimum gold amounts from MouseHunt are wrong. For instance, 100 gold isn't how much a 1 oz White mouse is worth, it's 101 gold... 0 oz mice don't exist. I'll go through and update everything, but as Matt Johns said, the points values of Mobster, Master Burglar and Leprechaun mice are still needed. Revengeance 11:40, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

  • I've done a bit of adjusting on the first eight mice articles... I got rid of the quoted description, since I've added an "External links" section with a link to each mouse's Facebook page if people want to view it, along with high resolution images. I cleaned up the "Loot" sections on articles which have it, ordering the loot by location. Oh, and the points/gold sentences are formatted as: "They are worth at most (value) points and at least (value) gold." Just to keep it simple. If we think it's a suitable format, I or anybody else can get around to reworking the others. Revengeance 14:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Mice Type

Perhaps it time to create a category for Mice Types such as 'Ghostly', 'War', and 'All Around' like Burroughs/Furoma/Gnawnia Mice for trap effectiveness

  • What's "War"? HitGrab hasn't specified any mouse types, so anything like this would be speculative. Revengeance 08:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
    • Well I'm thinking of references to mice that are weak against certain power types. But as one person has done with the Tactical page, identifying the specific mice that are weak to it. So perhaps instead of separating the mice include "effectiveness" against mice in the power type page.
      • Sorted the list into Physical, Shadow, Tactical, although I've probably misplaced some mice so if anyone has clearer info please do move them into the correct list. -- Grexx 16:41, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
        • I've reverted it to the ordering from MH. Mice aren't "Physical", "Shadow" or "Tactical"... those are power types of weapons. Certain mice are simply vulnerable to certain power types. Most mice articles already state their vulnerabilities, which is the simplest way to handle this. Additionally, each power type article could list which mice they are effective against. Revengeance 02:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Missing High-Res Images