Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Location"

From MHWiki
m (Move to Vertical?: bullet)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
* That goes against the convention on virtually every wiki I've worked on (Wikipedia being the preeminent example).  Infoboxes are vertical at the top right; navboxes are horizontal at the bottom. --&nbsp;[[User:Brossow|B.Rossow]]&nbsp;<sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Brossow|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Brossow|contr]]</sub> 03:34, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 
* That goes against the convention on virtually every wiki I've worked on (Wikipedia being the preeminent example).  Infoboxes are vertical at the top right; navboxes are horizontal at the bottom. --&nbsp;[[User:Brossow|B.Rossow]]&nbsp;<sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Brossow|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Brossow|contr]]</sub> 03:34, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
** I'm fully aware of that, however, Locations don't have infoboxes, and the navbox at the bottom looks oddly out of place.  Maybe if the Sidebar shown here was turned into both a location infobox and navbox? --[[User:Navarr|Navarr]] 18:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:02, 29 December 2008

Move to Vertical?


The horizontal version just seems slightly out of place, what if we moved to a vertical version? I prepared a sample User:Navarr/Template:Locations. --Navarr 00:33, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

  • That goes against the convention on virtually every wiki I've worked on (Wikipedia being the preeminent example). Infoboxes are vertical at the top right; navboxes are horizontal at the bottom. -- B.Rossow talkcontr 03:34, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
    • I'm fully aware of that, however, Locations don't have infoboxes, and the navbox at the bottom looks oddly out of place. Maybe if the Sidebar shown here was turned into both a location infobox and navbox? --Navarr 18:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC)