Talk:Mice

Just noticing a trend in mouse desciptions saying "they are concidered <blank> to catch" where blank is effortless, challenging, etc. The difficulty rating is relative to each trap setup so perhaps it is best to not include the difficulty rating in the generic description of the mice. --Dave Vanderburg 21:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Update: I've edited nearly all of the mice to remove the difficulty listed (as it is trap-dependent) and add the max point value. Mice that still need point values added to their page: Leprechaun, and Mobster. Matt Johns 20:43, 16 October 2008 (EST).

Let's not list suggested mice or "unofficial" mice here please.

Categories

Just threw the mice into regional categories (Gnawnia, Burroughs and Furoma), according to the MouseHunt lists. So, the articles probably only need to mention locations from now on. Revengeance 18:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Oops

All of the minimum gold amounts from MouseHunt are wrong. For instance, 100 gold isn't how much a 1 oz White mouse is worth, it's 101 gold... 0 oz mice don't exist. I'll go through and update everything, but as Matt Johns said, the points values of Mobster, Master Burglar and Leprechaun mice are still needed. Revengeance 11:40, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

• I've done a bit of adjusting on the first eight mice articles... I got rid of the quoted description, since I've added an "External links" section with a link to each mouse's Facebook page if people want to view it, along with high resolution images. I cleaned up the "Loot" sections on articles which have it, ordering the loot by location. Oh, and the points/gold sentences are formatted as: "They are worth at most (value) points and at least (value) gold." Just to keep it simple. If we think it's a suitable format, I or anybody else can get around to reworking the others. Revengeance 14:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)