Difference between revisions of "Talk:Blueprints"
From MHWiki
(→Ordering: clarification) |
(→Ordering) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::: I think the orginal editor tried to make in alphabetical because it was just barely off so i fixed it. It can be changed. --[[User:Stinson|Tmm stinson]] 06:27, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | ::: I think the orginal editor tried to make in alphabetical because it was just barely off so i fixed it. It can be changed. --[[User:Stinson|Tmm stinson]] 06:27, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::Well different editors have used both approaches while adding the recent string of new blueprints, but the original article was in chronological order. Which is why I wanted to start the discussion. --[[User:Hyperchao|Hyperchao]] 06:34, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | ::::Well different editors have used both approaches while adding the recent string of new blueprints, but the original article was in chronological order. Which is why I wanted to start the discussion. --[[User:Hyperchao|Hyperchao]] 06:34, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::::I see well i dont really know the exact order so if you do feel free to edit it back.--[[User:Stinson|Tmm stinson]] 06:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:38, 11 August 2009
Ordering
Should the blueprints be listed in order of appearance (giving a mini history of MH) or alphabetical order? It's somewhere in between right now. --Hyperchao 00:07, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- I say alphabetical--Tmm stinson 03:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Forgot to mention: I actually liked the chronological order. --Hyperchao 06:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- I think the orginal editor tried to make in alphabetical because it was just barely off so i fixed it. It can be changed. --Tmm stinson 06:27, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well different editors have used both approaches while adding the recent string of new blueprints, but the original article was in chronological order. Which is why I wanted to start the discussion. --Hyperchao 06:34, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- I see well i dont really know the exact order so if you do feel free to edit it back.--Tmm stinson 06:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well different editors have used both approaches while adding the recent string of new blueprints, but the original article was in chronological order. Which is why I wanted to start the discussion. --Hyperchao 06:34, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- I think the orginal editor tried to make in alphabetical because it was just barely off so i fixed it. It can be changed. --Tmm stinson 06:27, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Forgot to mention: I actually liked the chronological order. --Hyperchao 06:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
