Difference between revisions of "Talk:Radioactive Blue Cheese Potion"

From MHWiki
(reply)
(Figures for Converting Brie to RB: reply to reply)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
::I believe the numbers are now accurate. A previous editor simply doubled the existing numbers, which wasn't quite accurate.  We're good now. --&nbsp;[[User:Brossow|B.Rossow]]&nbsp;<sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Brossow|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Brossow|contr]]</sub> 04:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 
::I believe the numbers are now accurate. A previous editor simply doubled the existing numbers, which wasn't quite accurate.  We're good now. --&nbsp;[[User:Brossow|B.Rossow]]&nbsp;<sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Brossow|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Brossow|contr]]</sub> 04:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 
:::Sorry my bad. I saw the numbers for Legendary went from 7 to 14 and the Dev announcement of a "doubling" of the amount so I assumed it was the same for the rest -_-. Apparently there's another underlying index and multiplier behind the figures. But its a little odd that with the 1/3 SB+ logic, Legendary gets 13.33 RB per standard potion. And in any case it is possible that the numbers for the Greater RB Potions are going to be a little off too. -- [[User:Grexx|Grexx]] 05:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 
:::Sorry my bad. I saw the numbers for Legendary went from 7 to 14 and the Dev announcement of a "doubling" of the amount so I assumed it was the same for the rest -_-. Apparently there's another underlying index and multiplier behind the figures. But its a little odd that with the 1/3 SB+ logic, Legendary gets 13.33 RB per standard potion. And in any case it is possible that the numbers for the Greater RB Potions are going to be a little off too. -- [[User:Grexx|Grexx]] 05:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 +
::::No big deal — it's fixed now. Devs said it doubled, so it was only logical to assume they actually meant it. LOL! The formula appears to be 1/3 SB+ #, rounded to next highest integer. I have already confirmed that the Greater #s are accurate, so we're good there. --&nbsp;[[User:Brossow|B.Rossow]]&nbsp;<sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Brossow|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Brossow|contr]]</sub> 05:02, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:02, 6 February 2009

Mouse list

I think it would be nice 'n' nifty to have a list of mice that drop the potions. Just a thought. _m. 21:20, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

  • Go for it. :-) -- B.Rossow talkcontr 21:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
    • But not tonight! (quote from Depeche Mode) :P ... ||||| happy hunting |||||  m. talkcontr

Figures for Converting Brie to RB

Just want to check that the new figures for Brie to RB are correct. I'm hero and only getting 15--Amyarlp 03:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Just checked and the number is wrong for Knight, too. Made a temp change and will seek board input ASAP. -- B.Rossow talkcontr 03:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
I believe the numbers are now accurate. A previous editor simply doubled the existing numbers, which wasn't quite accurate. We're good now. -- B.Rossow talkcontr 04:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Sorry my bad. I saw the numbers for Legendary went from 7 to 14 and the Dev announcement of a "doubling" of the amount so I assumed it was the same for the rest -_-. Apparently there's another underlying index and multiplier behind the figures. But its a little odd that with the 1/3 SB+ logic, Legendary gets 13.33 RB per standard potion. And in any case it is possible that the numbers for the Greater RB Potions are going to be a little off too. -- Grexx 05:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
No big deal — it's fixed now. Devs said it doubled, so it was only logical to assume they actually meant it. LOL! The formula appears to be 1/3 SB+ #, rounded to next highest integer. I have already confirmed that the Greater #s are accurate, so we're good there. -- B.Rossow talkcontr 05:02, 6 February 2009 (UTC)