Difference between revisions of "Talk:Travel"
(→Change in travel costs with Bristle Woods: please update whole locations rather than bits here and there) |
(→Change in travel costs with Bristle Woods) |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
::As much as possible, please update the whole swathe of travel costs up to the highest area that you are currently able to reach. -- [[User:Grexx|Grexx]] 22:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | ::As much as possible, please update the whole swathe of travel costs up to the highest area that you are currently able to reach. -- [[User:Grexx|Grexx]] 22:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :What still needs to be updated? Could we maybe italicize the numbers which are new or known to be the same, until we've fixed everything? Also note that you can see the cost without actually moving if you click on the area on the travel page, but then don't select "hunt here." -- [[User:Pakaran|Pakaran]] 23:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:19, 3 March 2009
Travel Prudence
Since it always costs nothing to go back to Gnawnia town, one should never pay more than the Gnawnia traveling cost. Thus, (based on these figures) anyone who goes from Digby town to the Meadow, the Laboratory to the Harbor, or almost anywhere to the Mountain is either ill-informed or dumb.
--Jpsanggaran 03:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
I don't get this comment. Whilst it is true that it costs nothing to go from anywhere to the gnawnia, it is not true that to go to gnawnia then on to any destination is cheaper. Case in point the example used above laboratory to harbour direct costs 1161 where as to go from the lab to gnawnia then on to the harbour cost 1448, that is 287 gold cheaper to go directly there.
I mean the reason I put this chart togeather is so people could work these things out and find the cheapest route from where they are to where they are headed, I think it ill informed to assume that the gnawnia travel cost is the only one that you should consider.
- The reason you don't get the comment is that the figures displayed were different on the date the comment was posted.69.108.230.204 05:07, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- weird...the data sheey I have has the same values as the current chart, except for gnawnia to digby at 921 instead of 920. when the chart was formated into it's current pretty format I guess someone might of inadvertantly changed a value--Jpsanggaran 11:23, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- The best, and currently only way I can see to save money (now that Ronza is gone) is in the specific case if you are traveling to the Mountain. It is usually cheaper to go to town first, then on to the mountain. --Sokolok 13:55, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Change in travel costs with Bristle Woods
I've noticed further change in the travel cost from Training Grounds to the Mousoleum. Seems like a bit more has changed. Please assist in updating. -- Grexx 21:28, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I updated travel costs from Dojo - lots of changes! Camomiletea 21:36, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Today's travelling costs:
- I traveled from the Bazaar and have arrived at the Mousoleum. The cost of the journey was 993 gold (this is more expensive now)
- I traveled from the Mousoleum and have arrived at the Laboratory. The cost of the journey was 3,177 gold (but this is cheaper!)
- I traveled from the Meditation Room and have arrived at the Bazaar. The cost of the journey was 1,237 gold (far more expensive!)--Fleurione 22:38, 3 March 2009 (UTC) (Leg)
- As much as possible, please update the whole swathe of travel costs up to the highest area that you are currently able to reach. -- Grexx 22:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- What still needs to be updated? Could we maybe italicize the numbers which are new or known to be the same, until we've fixed everything? Also note that you can see the cost without actually moving if you click on the area on the travel page, but then don't select "hunt here." -- Pakaran 23:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)