Difference between revisions of "Talk:Potions"
From MHWiki
Kytti khat (talk | contribs) (overlapping edits, oops) |
Kytti khat (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::There's a lengthy discussion about redirects in the editor's corner area. More people should take the time to become familiar with this part of the wiki. --<span style="border:2px ridge #aaf;background-color:#fff;padding:1px 8px;font:normal 10px Verdana,sans-serif;margin-left:-8px;">[[User:Brossow|<span style="color:#358;">B.Rossow</span>]] · [[User_talk:Brossow|<span style="color:#35d;">talk</span>]]</span> 13:48, 2 November 2009 (UTC) | :::There's a lengthy discussion about redirects in the editor's corner area. More people should take the time to become familiar with this part of the wiki. --<span style="border:2px ridge #aaf;background-color:#fff;padding:1px 8px;font:normal 10px Verdana,sans-serif;margin-left:-8px;">[[User:Brossow|<span style="color:#358;">B.Rossow</span>]] · [[User_talk:Brossow|<span style="color:#35d;">talk</span>]]</span> 13:48, 2 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::So now you're implying that users that might have difficulties navigating should be limited in their options for finding the information they are seeking. For example, readers with dyslexia, many of which are highly intelligent, yet you would classify them as "too thick or too lazy", who are you to judge who the wiki is suitable for? {{user:kytti_khat/sig}} 02:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:19, 3 November 2009
redirects like this are more user friendly than the "Search results" pages. ~kytti khat– 06:01, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- There's a link to the target article right on the main page. If between that and the search results players are too thick or too lazy to find the target page, I'm not sure their time is best spent playing online games. --B.Rossow · talk 12:51, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- I'm with Khat. Redirects are free and occasionally help the user experience. There's no reason to insult inexperienced users. Let's just make it as friendly and useful as possible. --Metal 13:36, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- So now you're implying that users that might have difficulties navigating should be limited in their options for finding the information they are seeking. For example, readers with dyslexia, many of which are highly intelligent, yet you would classify them as "too thick or too lazy", who are you to judge who the wiki is suitable for? ~kytti khat– 02:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
