Difference between revisions of "Talk:Terminology"
From MHWiki
(reply) |
(Relevance to the wiki? Recommending that scattered terminology articles be consolidated here. Comments & feedback needed. Article is currently abandoned.) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:: i didn't want to be rude and change thing back that you just did though... ;) --[[User:PumpkinDog|PumpkinDog]] | :: i didn't want to be rude and change thing back that you just did though... ;) --[[User:PumpkinDog|PumpkinDog]] | ||
:::I definitely appreciate that, but wikis are no place for egos and hurt feelings. If you see something that needs changing, go for it! :-) -- [[User:Brossow|B.Rossow]] <sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Brossow|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Brossow|contr]]</sub> 20:56, 18 December 2008 (UTC) | :::I definitely appreciate that, but wikis are no place for egos and hurt feelings. If you see something that needs changing, go for it! :-) -- [[User:Brossow|B.Rossow]] <sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Brossow|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Brossow|contr]]</sub> 20:56, 18 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Relevance == | ||
+ | Just wondering if this article is still relevant. It's not linked from anywhere, but I can see some use for the page in combining all the scattered articles that are in existence at the moment regarding Terminology, such as those for [[Gold]] and [[Points]] etc. Comments? -- [[User:Grexx|Grexx]] 11:03, 16 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:03, 16 August 2009
not sure how i feel about the right table of contents. The ToC should be the first thing the user sees since this page is meant to be more of a glossary. let their eyes browse through the terms available first before showing them lots of text and disorienting them. plus on a wide screen monitory it's way off to the right. --PumpkinDog
- To be fair, there ARE only five terms. It's not like a massive list. But if you want to change it, just do it. Not every change needs discussion and voting. :-) -- B.Rossow talkcontr 16:48, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- i didn't want to be rude and change thing back that you just did though... ;) --PumpkinDog
Relevance
Just wondering if this article is still relevant. It's not linked from anywhere, but I can see some use for the page in combining all the scattered articles that are in existence at the moment regarding Terminology, such as those for Gold and Points etc. Comments? -- Grexx 11:03, 16 August 2009 (UTC)