Difference between revisions of "Talk:Treasure Chest"
From MHWiki
(Chest content organization) |
(→New Layout of Page: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Chest Content Organization == | == Chest Content Organization == | ||
I'm not sure whether we should list the contents of the chests by chest types or by hunter ranks. The item types seem to depend largely on rank, and the numbers on the types of chests. Any thoughts? -- [[User:S18067|S18067]] <sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:S18067|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/S18067|contr]]</sub> 08:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC) | I'm not sure whether we should list the contents of the chests by chest types or by hunter ranks. The item types seem to depend largely on rank, and the numbers on the types of chests. Any thoughts? -- [[User:S18067|S18067]] <sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:S18067|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/S18067|contr]]</sub> 08:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == New Layout of Page == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I changed the layout of the page so that it makes more sense, and tables are not duplicated senselessly. I'm still not sure if this is the best way to organise the page, so I don't mind if anyone changes it. I got the rank specific data from [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0An8esHSXteUJdF9CeWx6TC1pWGJfOHZCOGxWM2U5VXc&gid=34 here]. I'm quite sure the information is accurate, but if anyone finds any errors, please fix them. -- [[User:S18067|S18067]] <sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:S18067|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/S18067|contr]]</sub> 12:43, 27 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:43, 27 October 2012
Chest Content Organization
I'm not sure whether we should list the contents of the chests by chest types or by hunter ranks. The item types seem to depend largely on rank, and the numbers on the types of chests. Any thoughts? -- S18067 talkcontr 08:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
New Layout of Page
I changed the layout of the page so that it makes more sense, and tables are not duplicated senselessly. I'm still not sure if this is the best way to organise the page, so I don't mind if anyone changes it. I got the rank specific data from here. I'm quite sure the information is accurate, but if anyone finds any errors, please fix them. -- S18067 talkcontr 12:43, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
