Difference between revisions of "Talk:Onyx Stone"

From MHWiki
(reply)
m (typo)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I am suggesting that we delete "The stone seems to not have a clear use. Perhaps its purpose will be revewal eventualy..." from the Description section since it does have a clear use - crafting the Arcane Capturing Rod of Never Yielding Mystery. Do we want to keep the orginal text in a trivia / history section since this was the initial in game description?
 
I am suggesting that we delete "The stone seems to not have a clear use. Perhaps its purpose will be revewal eventualy..." from the Description section since it does have a clear use - crafting the Arcane Capturing Rod of Never Yielding Mystery. Do we want to keep the orginal text in a trivia / history section since this was the initial in game description?
  
:You're joking, right? That's the '''current''' in-game description, not just initial. Unless and until the devs change it, that what '''WILL''' remain here as the description. --&nbsp;[[User:Brossow|B.Rossow]]&nbsp;<sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Brossow|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Brossow|contr]]</sub> 12:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
+
:You're joking, right? That's the '''current''' in-game description, not just initial. Unless and until the devs change it, that's what '''WILL''' remain here as the description. --&nbsp;[[User:Brossow|B.Rossow]]&nbsp;<sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Brossow|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Brossow|contr]]</sub> 12:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:28, 13 April 2009

I am suggesting that we delete "The stone seems to not have a clear use. Perhaps its purpose will be revewal eventualy..." from the Description section since it does have a clear use - crafting the Arcane Capturing Rod of Never Yielding Mystery. Do we want to keep the orginal text in a trivia / history section since this was the initial in game description?

You're joking, right? That's the current in-game description, not just initial. Unless and until the devs change it, that's what WILL remain here as the description. -- B.Rossow talkcontr 12:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC)