Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Gameplay"
From MHWiki
Ralphminer (talk | contribs) (→Redundant agreement with removal) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hmm I do recall this being discussed someplace, but here should be a more suitable spot. The gameplay category seems to me, to be quite redundant. Everything on the wiki is related to the game, so unless we have a clearer definition of what belongs under the gameplay category, I think it might be a good idea to do away with it. [[User:Grexx|-- Grexx]] 03:54, 18 March 2010 (UTC) | Hmm I do recall this being discussed someplace, but here should be a more suitable spot. The gameplay category seems to me, to be quite redundant. Everything on the wiki is related to the game, so unless we have a clearer definition of what belongs under the gameplay category, I think it might be a good idea to do away with it. [[User:Grexx|-- Grexx]] 03:54, 18 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
: I agree - doesn't seem to provide value -- [[User:Ralphminer|Ralphminer]] 11:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC) | : I agree - doesn't seem to provide value -- [[User:Ralphminer|Ralphminer]] 11:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | : Maybe this should be the root category? I think this category would be better then [[:Category:Browse]] --[[User:Nux|Nux]] 22:07, 18 March 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:07, 18 March 2010
Redundant
Hmm I do recall this being discussed someplace, but here should be a more suitable spot. The gameplay category seems to me, to be quite redundant. Everything on the wiki is related to the game, so unless we have a clearer definition of what belongs under the gameplay category, I think it might be a good idea to do away with it. -- Grexx 03:54, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- I agree - doesn't seem to provide value -- Ralphminer 11:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe this should be the root category? I think this category would be better then Category:Browse --Nux 22:07, 18 March 2010 (UTC)