Talk:MouseHunt Wiki

Below are current discussions regarding the wiki in general and the Main Page in specific. Older discussions can be found in the archive here.

---

Uploads of files

We are resolving some technical issues that are preventing the uploading of files. --Dave Vanderburg 15:34, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Perfect :-) Thanks a lot in advance for your help! --Mulleflupp 06:52, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi all, I just noticed that uploads have been disabled on this wiki, which is a pity since it would be a great opportunity to show a picture of all the mice, traps, cheeses etc. on the respective page. Does anybody know more? --Mulleflupp 14:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I believe Joel has administrative powers over the Wiki.

He's off on tour at the moment, but I'll try and contact him to amend this.

All we'll need to do is address the viewers that they could potentially stumble upon spoilers because I know some players prefer to unlock the mice images through their hard work.

--MH Illustrator 15:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Uploads have now been enabled. --Dave Vanderburg 21:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Great! The only question is how to handle pictures, i.e. if it is a good idea to put the images in each article, which means that most articles with pictures could act as spoilers. In this case it would be useful to put a general spoiler warning on the Main Page. Another alternative might be to put all images the user uncovers through gameplay (mainly mouse pictures) on one page and before each link to this page, we put a spoiler warning. The other (non-spoiler) images could of course be integrated in the related articles.

Any opinions? --Mulleflupp 09:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm up for the all-purpose spoiler warning on the Main Page, since the "mouseum" idea probably wouldn't work for people who only want to see the mice they've caught. How about a link on the silhouetted image pages, leading to the images of their revealed versions? "Spoiler: Go [here] to unveil this mouse.", for example. Still, I'm definitely in favor of the Main Page warning. Leaving all of the articles with silhouettes doesn't sound very Wiki-like.

Is anybody else still unable to upload? --Revengeance 18:44, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Yep, the "File uploads are disabled on MHWiki." is still there. As long as this is the case, we don't have to worry abuot the spoiler warning. --Mulleflupp 09:10, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

I am not able to upload, though I think the site needs pictures, even if they are a spoiler, Is there a mouse-over that we can use to avoid the spoiler issue? --Sokolok 15:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

I am unable to upload files. I need this feature of the wiki to continue work in my Sandbox. Eepeng 07:02, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

I can't upload atm :) Daworm 11:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

This'll be fixed soon yes? I wanna do a couple of things but need image uploads :D Daworm 05:25, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

If HitGrab does not want to reveal the image i guess they will never put that option available. --Cizagna 23:56, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Well they said it should be resolved... at the least allow upload but state no mouse images to be uploaded... and just means some volunteer sysops need to trawl added images :) Daworm 01:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

• This place needs more visual stimulus and less morons who can't construct a coherent sentence. The developer's really need to take control of this thing. Revengeance 07:16, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Fewer morons, not less. (( :-p )) So what's with the upload option? Still seems to be disabled. -- B.Rossow ^talk_contr 15:19, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
    • That second sentence needs an introductory comma. Pobody's nerfect. :P Revengeance 17:37, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
      • No, it really doesn't, at least not according to the Chicago Manual of Style. Here's a link: Chicago Style Q&A: Commas. Can you tell I'm bored at work on the Friday before Christmas? LOL! (You'll notice I didn't point out how a certain someone used an apostrophe to make a plural in that same entry. :p) -- B.Rossow ^talk_contr 18:08, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
        • So "No, it doesn't" shouldn't have a comma, either? Can you let an even argument rest now? Revengeance 10:52, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

• LOL! Who's arguing? Was just bored at the office and putting my degree in English to work for a change. It's all good. :-) -- B.Rossow ^talk_contr 15:33, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Status ?

Just wondering what the status is of image uploads. I mean, what is so hard about it? Or is it the risk of pr0n images being uploaded or something?

Spoiler warning: main page only?

SPOILER ALERT!
Throughout this site you'll find information normally discovered through gameplay. If you prefer to discover everything on your own, this site may affect your enjoyment of the game.

After spending some significant time working on another game-related wiki, I've come to the conclusion that spoiler warnings on individual pages on a game-related site are silly. Anyone who comes here looking for information is daft if they don't expect to see spoilers without being warned on each page. The notice on the other site is atop the main page only, floated in a box to the right of the intro text as you see here. Thoughts? -- B.Rossow ^talk_contr 15:26, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

I think that'll fit in nicely on the main page floated to the right. If you come to the wiki and see something you shouldn't, it's your own fault. But a main "warning" at the top of the main page never hurts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DaWorm (talk • contribs) 02:23, 1 February 2009

I rather like the idea of having a single warning because nobody comes here without expecting spoilers. It looks nicer, too. - Frostlight 03:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

It's been a week and there are no voiced objections, so I'm going to go ahead and make the change. Please feel free to help out by removing the spoiler template from any pages you come across. In the meantime, I'm going to blank the template so visually it will have no effect. -- B.Rossow ^talk_contr 03:43, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't have a general objection, but the crafting page is linked directly from Mouse Hunt so i think it should have a warning. If there are any other direct links there should be warnings there too as people can get there without seeing the main page.--Meurquidi 04:08, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

MouseHunt Toolbar

I'm surprised no one has come up with the page yet. The link is here. Appreciate if someone created a page for it as it has become quite an integral part of MH with the 3 free SB+ daily. Would need to categorize it too. -- Grexx 16:17, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

• It was already listed on the third-party tools page. Because it's no longer third-party, I moved it up a level to Related links. Not sure that it needs its own page but could certainly benefit from a description on that page. -- B.Rossow ^talk_contr 16:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Oh ya thanks I saw the link now. Never thought to look there. However I was thinking of putting up more details, such as description of the options and FAQ + troubleshooting info since its a recurring topic on the MH forums. Anyways if I can find the time I'll get it done. -- Grexx 09:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Deletions...

I am just wondering about deletions of comments, be it self or anyone elses.

I personally feel these should only happen in the event of spam, if text is there it should stay there and at the most archived out. If it is a talk page of a user, then it should be the user who managers their archiving.

Just my 2cents Daworm  -T- / -C- / -P- 08:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Nothing is ever truly deleted on a wiki except by a sysop. Archiving old, no longer relevant comments on article Talk pages, particularly on popular pages with a lot of discussion, makes good sense to promote discussion and make it easier for people to participate. Anyone interested in old news can simply go to the page archive (if one was created, as on this page -- see link at top) or page history and look for an older revision. As far as user Talk pages go, I don't see a problem with people "archiving" their own comments that are no longer relevant or have already been addressed, at least as long as theirs were the only comments within a particular section (for example, as I recently removed from Dave's talk page, which may or may not have prompted your comments here). IMHO, of course. -- B.Rossow ^talk_contr 14:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

It did prompt my comments, I've seen it off and on with other wiki's and addressed the same thing. If I make a comment on any page, I leave it until such a time that archiving is needed myself. Even if I'm the only one to have a discussion in it. Daworm 21:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

To each his own.  :-) -- B.Rossow ^talk_contr 00:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)