Talk:MouseHunt Jargon

Title Change Suggestion

Not everything that is in here (or needs to be in here) is an abbreviation or acronym. Suggest title change to "Abbreviations and forum jargon", or something similar. --Winelight 07:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Silence is consent? --Winelight 12:07, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Not in this case. Give people time to consider and comment. There's no deadline. --B.Rossow · talk 12:12, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Maybe then we also need to consider that it is not only the forums where this jargon is used. I mainly stay away from there since it was overrun by beggars, whingers and whiners and I still use this short-speak since it is convenient and much faster when talking to other hunters on their Cork Boards or commenting on (mouse[hunt related]-)posts. I personally detest the word jargon but that might only be due to me not being an English native speaker and the negative connotations the word has in German (my mother tongue). I'd suggest argot but doubt that (m)any will know what it stands for (including myself ;]) so I stick with lingo which is close enough to language which is what is meant in the end. So my vote would be for MouseHunt lingo.

BlingBot

Added 'blingbot' (another variation of chromebot). This nickname is derived from the first line of the description. --WyndStryke 18:15, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Reverted that edit. First, it's not an abbreviation or acronym. Second, I did a thorough Google search and that term is virtually NEVER used. In fact, I can only turn up two instances, once in April and once in August. But the first point makes my second moot. -- B.Rossow ^talk_contr 18:56, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Strange that Google shows up so few instances, because I have referred to it as the "blingbot" myself on several occasions in the forum. And as for your first point, it rather misses the purpose of this page, which is to provide users with the full name for terms they might see used in the forum. The fact that it is neither an abbreviation nor an acronym merely reveals a deficiency in the page title - I don't see the value in deliberately concealing helpful information from users just because it doesn't fit what someone once titled the page. --Winelight 22:15, 19 September 2009 (UTC)