Difference between revisions of "Talk:MouseHunt Wiki"

From MHWiki
(Pooflinger Tools: reply)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
Was suggested on the forum that a link to Pooflinger be added to the main page. Is very useful, and currently quite well hidden. Just thought I would get feelings on this. [[User:Fishwick|Fishwick]] 18:47, 08 April 2009 (UTC) Just seen Brossows comments: No worries.
 
Was suggested on the forum that a link to Pooflinger be added to the main page. Is very useful, and currently quite well hidden. Just thought I would get feelings on this. [[User:Fishwick|Fishwick]] 18:47, 08 April 2009 (UTC) Just seen Brossows comments: No worries.
 +
 +
:Just to further clarify, the developers do not support any 3rd party tools so they do not wish to have a direct link on the main page. At the moment however, they have allowed them to stay as links in the related links section. See the old edit [http://mhwiki.hitgrab.com/wiki/index.php?title=MouseHunt_Wiki&diff=51981&oldid=50011 here] for reference. -- [[User:Grexx|Grexx]] 07:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:35, 9 April 2009

Below are current discussions regarding the wiki in general and the Main Page in specific. Older discussions can be found in the following links:

Archive 1, Archive 2

New! Tag

Please keep the " NEW!" tag for a standard 1 month or so after the page using it is created. That should be enough time for it to be recognized by players, and not too long that it becomes old. Older pages should not be using the NEW! tag, but instead a more appropriate REVAMPED! or something similar can be used, if needed. -- Grexx 17:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Pooflinger Tools

Was suggested on the forum that a link to Pooflinger be added to the main page. Is very useful, and currently quite well hidden. Just thought I would get feelings on this. Fishwick 18:47, 08 April 2009 (UTC) Just seen Brossows comments: No worries.

Just to further clarify, the developers do not support any 3rd party tools so they do not wish to have a direct link on the main page. At the moment however, they have allowed them to stay as links in the related links section. See the old edit here for reference. -- Grexx 07:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC)