Difference between revisions of "Talk:Records"

From MHWiki
(Best 36 Hour Log?)
m (Vanity: new section)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
Should we add a "record" for the most gold and most points shown on a 36 hour log, or would that be too hard to determine?  Moreover, would logs longer than 36 hours complicate the issue? (okay, duh, they would, but by how much?) --[[User:Dreamwalker|Dreamwalker]] 22:40, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 
Should we add a "record" for the most gold and most points shown on a 36 hour log, or would that be too hard to determine?  Moreover, would logs longer than 36 hours complicate the issue? (okay, duh, they would, but by how much?) --[[User:Dreamwalker|Dreamwalker]] 22:40, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 
::I like the idea and have added the idea. I have also created a group on the forums--[[User:Stinson|Stinson]] 15:24, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 
::I like the idea and have added the idea. I have also created a group on the forums--[[User:Stinson|Stinson]] 15:24, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Vanity ==
 +
 +
We've had lengthy discussions in the past about pointless vanity stuff being posted to the wiki. Is there a consensus from established editors that this page really belongs here? I just came across it and am disgusted by the idea. Showing off individual "accomplishments" is NOT what this wiki is for. --&nbsp;[[User:Brossow|B.Rossow]]&nbsp;<sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Brossow|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Brossow|contr]]</sub> 16:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:44, 19 August 2009


Heaviest catch Stat

I think the heaviest catch stat should be reintroduced to mousehunt.--Tmm stinson 04:29, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Updates

I am able to update the catches when the new updated lists come out.--Tmm stinson 06:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Best 36 Hour Log?

Should we add a "record" for the most gold and most points shown on a 36 hour log, or would that be too hard to determine? Moreover, would logs longer than 36 hours complicate the issue? (okay, duh, they would, but by how much?) --Dreamwalker 22:40, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

I like the idea and have added the idea. I have also created a group on the forums--Stinson 15:24, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Vanity

We've had lengthy discussions in the past about pointless vanity stuff being posted to the wiki. Is there a consensus from established editors that this page really belongs here? I just came across it and am disgusted by the idea. Showing off individual "accomplishments" is NOT what this wiki is for. -- B.Rossow talkcontr 16:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC)