Difference between revisions of "Talk:Traps"
From MHWiki
Revengeance (talk | contribs) (→Weapon Template) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*Much better. Can we have another header at the bottom of the box for the official descriptions? Users keep insisting on having them in the articles, but sticking them at the top in italics doesn't seem very professional to me. Also, can we color-code each title box to reflect Power Types? Maybe keep the current color for Physical, white text on black or a green color for Shadow, and a red color for Tactical (best I could think of from looking at each symbol). [[User:Revengeance|Revengeance]] 15:51, 18 December 2008 (UTC) | *Much better. Can we have another header at the bottom of the box for the official descriptions? Users keep insisting on having them in the articles, but sticking them at the top in italics doesn't seem very professional to me. Also, can we color-code each title box to reflect Power Types? Maybe keep the current color for Physical, white text on black or a green color for Shadow, and a red color for Tactical (best I could think of from looking at each symbol). [[User:Revengeance|Revengeance]] 15:51, 18 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
**If we move the description to the infobox, then (1) the box will be huge for some weapons and, more importantly, (2) for some weapons it will leave virtually no page content. IMHO. -- [[User:Brossow|B.Rossow]] <sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Brossow|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Brossow|contr]]</sub> 17:08, 18 December 2008 (UTC) | **If we move the description to the infobox, then (1) the box will be huge for some weapons and, more importantly, (2) for some weapons it will leave virtually no page content. IMHO. -- [[User:Brossow|B.Rossow]] <sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Brossow|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Brossow|contr]]</sub> 17:08, 18 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | ***Is there a more presentable style of formatting we can apply to them, then? Or a separate box altogether? [[User:Revengeance|Revengeance]] 20:00, 18 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
==Power Type== | ==Power Type== | ||
Should have information not just on the types it is effective against, but very effective and not very effective writeup too. Could possibly list down the mice, or link to the mice page? -- [[User:Grexx|Grexx]] 18:37, 30 November 2008 (UTC) | Should have information not just on the types it is effective against, but very effective and not very effective writeup too. Could possibly list down the mice, or link to the mice page? -- [[User:Grexx|Grexx]] 18:37, 30 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
* No problem if there's some empirical data to support it. As of right now the only official "not very effective" info I've seen is in non-shadow traps against shadow-type mice. But I've been holed up in Furoma for a long time now, so I may have missed something. -- [[User:Brossow|B.Rossow]] <sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Brossow|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Brossow|contr]]</sub> 17:08, 18 December 2008 (UTC) | * No problem if there's some empirical data to support it. As of right now the only official "not very effective" info I've seen is in non-shadow traps against shadow-type mice. But I've been holed up in Furoma for a long time now, so I may have missed something. -- [[User:Brossow|B.Rossow]] <sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Brossow|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Brossow|contr]]</sub> 17:08, 18 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:00, 18 December 2008
Weapon Template
FYI, I have created a Weapon template to add consistency (and yes, a tiny bit of flash) to weapon info pages. Comments are welcome. --Brossow 17:35, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
- Much better. Can we have another header at the bottom of the box for the official descriptions? Users keep insisting on having them in the articles, but sticking them at the top in italics doesn't seem very professional to me. Also, can we color-code each title box to reflect Power Types? Maybe keep the current color for Physical, white text on black or a green color for Shadow, and a red color for Tactical (best I could think of from looking at each symbol). Revengeance 15:51, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- If we move the description to the infobox, then (1) the box will be huge for some weapons and, more importantly, (2) for some weapons it will leave virtually no page content. IMHO. -- B.Rossow talkcontr 17:08, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- Is there a more presentable style of formatting we can apply to them, then? Or a separate box altogether? Revengeance 20:00, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- If we move the description to the infobox, then (1) the box will be huge for some weapons and, more importantly, (2) for some weapons it will leave virtually no page content. IMHO. -- B.Rossow talkcontr 17:08, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Power Type
Should have information not just on the types it is effective against, but very effective and not very effective writeup too. Could possibly list down the mice, or link to the mice page? -- Grexx 18:37, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- No problem if there's some empirical data to support it. As of right now the only official "not very effective" info I've seen is in non-shadow traps against shadow-type mice. But I've been holed up in Furoma for a long time now, so I may have missed something. -- B.Rossow talkcontr 17:08, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
