Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Characters"
(Could someone please clarify the parameters of this category?) |
Camomiletea (talk | contribs) (→Inclusion of Mice?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Inclusion of Mice?== | ==Inclusion of Mice?== | ||
I just removed this category from the [[Balack the Banished]] article, thinking its presence was residual from back when Balack was believed to be human as opposed to a mouse, but then I noticed that [[Zurreal the Eternal]] is included in this category as well. Would it be possible for someone to clarify what this category is trying to accomplish? I personally find the current description to be a bit vague, stating only "Characters of the Kingdom of Gnawnia." My first assumption was that these characters were, well, human characters, but I see now that this may not be the case. In addition to the mice I mentioned, [[Bubbles]] the octopus is included. Not to mention the [[Terminology]] page, which completely throws me. —[[User:MearsMan|<b><font color="#B22222">'''''MearsMan'''''</font></b>]] [[User talk:MearsMan|<font color="#008B8B"><sup><u>''talk''</u></sup></font>]] 08:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC) | I just removed this category from the [[Balack the Banished]] article, thinking its presence was residual from back when Balack was believed to be human as opposed to a mouse, but then I noticed that [[Zurreal the Eternal]] is included in this category as well. Would it be possible for someone to clarify what this category is trying to accomplish? I personally find the current description to be a bit vague, stating only "Characters of the Kingdom of Gnawnia." My first assumption was that these characters were, well, human characters, but I see now that this may not be the case. In addition to the mice I mentioned, [[Bubbles]] the octopus is included. Not to mention the [[Terminology]] page, which completely throws me. —[[User:MearsMan|<b><font color="#B22222">'''''MearsMan'''''</font></b>]] [[User talk:MearsMan|<font color="#008B8B"><sup><u>''talk''</u></sup></font>]] 08:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I agree with you that having mice in here seems odd. I'd define it as "non-mice characters" (so that would include Bubbles, or anything else we might come across that isn't a mouse we can catch). I think [[Terminology]] is included because of [[King]]. Basically Terminology consists of other articles which are transcluded in it. I'll fix it so that the category isn't included. -- [[User:Camomiletea|camomiletea]] 15:08, 25 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:08, 25 February 2012
Inclusion of Mice?
I just removed this category from the Balack the Banished article, thinking its presence was residual from back when Balack was believed to be human as opposed to a mouse, but then I noticed that Zurreal the Eternal is included in this category as well. Would it be possible for someone to clarify what this category is trying to accomplish? I personally find the current description to be a bit vague, stating only "Characters of the Kingdom of Gnawnia." My first assumption was that these characters were, well, human characters, but I see now that this may not be the case. In addition to the mice I mentioned, Bubbles the octopus is included. Not to mention the Terminology page, which completely throws me. —MearsMan talk 08:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
- I agree with you that having mice in here seems odd. I'd define it as "non-mice characters" (so that would include Bubbles, or anything else we might come across that isn't a mouse we can catch). I think Terminology is included because of King. Basically Terminology consists of other articles which are transcluded in it. I'll fix it so that the category isn't included. -- camomiletea 15:08, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
