Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hunter's Hammer"
(Putting some sort of thought and order into the table) |
m (Soliciting comments on proposed new table layout) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="8" style="border-collapse:collapse; text-align:left; margin:5px 0 5px 20px;" | {| border="1" cellpadding="8" style="border-collapse:collapse; text-align:left; margin:5px 0 5px 20px;" | ||
− | ! | + | ! To get |
− | ! | + | ! you have to smash |
|- | |- | ||
| [[DeathBot Parts]] | | [[DeathBot Parts]] | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | ::Any comments on the above? --[[User:Winelight|Winelight]] 14:50, 12 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Smashable question == | == Smashable question == |
Revision as of 14:50, 12 October 2009
Nicely done on the page. But where are the new objects going to go? Does another table need to be added to the crafting pages? If so this may be helpful. Magic essence = "This substance is what gives SUPER|brie+ its magical properties. It can be used in a variety of recipes for unique results."--Delish 18:05, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Format of table
Firstly, to my mind, the table is the wrong way round. People don't want to know "Oh, I wonder what do I get if smash maki?", they want to know "Where do I get magic essence from?".
Secondly, attempting to roll up two different things in one line of the table is causing a spate of enquiries in the forum along the lines of "How do I make maki in order to smash it so I can get magic essence?", since it is not obvious that one line of the table is actually two different entries.
Thirdly, alphabetic order would be nice. Actually any sort of order would be nice. --Winelight 22:39, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
So what I would suggest is:
- Any comments on the above? --Winelight 14:50, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Smashable question
Page currently states all smashable stuff can be rebuilt. Still true with smashable DeathBot? No time to research myself but wanted to point it out at least. -- B.Rossow talkcontr 22:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- There isn't enough information right now on what can be done with DeathBot parts. I'll try tomodify the wording. -- Camomiletea 22:27, 6 March 2009 (UTC)