Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hunter's Hammer"
(→Format of table: some suggestions etc) |
(→Format of table) |
||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
:::Merging common items together would make more sense, ie Obelisk Parts: OOI, OOS. Alphabetical order is good. Title can probably do with some improvement, too wordy now lol. Personally, I would go with 'Item' and 'Source'. Some shading would be nice too. That's the things that come into mind offhand. -- [[User:Grexx|Grexx]] 14:59, 12 October 2009 (UTC) | :::Merging common items together would make more sense, ie Obelisk Parts: OOI, OOS. Alphabetical order is good. Title can probably do with some improvement, too wordy now lol. Personally, I would go with 'Item' and 'Source'. Some shading would be nice too. That's the things that come into mind offhand. -- [[User:Grexx|Grexx]] 14:59, 12 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::All sound good to me, especially the column headings, except the idea of merging common items, since it was confusion amongst hunters about how to make magic essence that led me to suggest splitting these rows in the first place! --[[User:Winelight|Winelight]] 15:08, 12 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Smashable question == | == Smashable question == | ||
Revision as of 15:08, 12 October 2009
Nicely done on the page. But where are the new objects going to go? Does another table need to be added to the crafting pages? If so this may be helpful. Magic essence = "This substance is what gives SUPER|brie+ its magical properties. It can be used in a variety of recipes for unique results."--Delish 18:05, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Format of table
Firstly, to my mind, the table is the wrong way round. People don't want to know "Oh, I wonder what do I get if smash maki?", they want to know "Where do I get magic essence from?".
Secondly, attempting to roll up two different things in one line of the table is causing a spate of enquiries in the forum along the lines of "How do I make maki in order to smash it so I can get magic essence?", since it is not obvious that one line of the table is actually two different entries.
Thirdly, alphabetic order would be nice. Actually any sort of order would be nice. --Winelight 22:39, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
So what I would suggest is:
- Any comments on the above? --Winelight 14:50, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Merging common items together would make more sense, ie Obelisk Parts: OOI, OOS. Alphabetical order is good. Title can probably do with some improvement, too wordy now lol. Personally, I would go with 'Item' and 'Source'. Some shading would be nice too. That's the things that come into mind offhand. -- Grexx 14:59, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- All sound good to me, especially the column headings, except the idea of merging common items, since it was confusion amongst hunters about how to make magic essence that led me to suggest splitting these rows in the first place! --Winelight 15:08, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Smashable question
Page currently states all smashable stuff can be rebuilt. Still true with smashable DeathBot? No time to research myself but wanted to point it out at least. -- B.Rossow talkcontr 22:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- There isn't enough information right now on what can be done with DeathBot parts. I'll try tomodify the wording. -- Camomiletea 22:27, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
