Difference between revisions of "Talk:Iceberg"
From MHWiki
Camomiletea (talk | contribs) (Effect of Bases/Charms on Progress) |
Camomiletea (talk | contribs) (→Generals Locking bug: new section) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I've added a couple of notes on the effect of bases to the mice tables. Not completely happy with the way it looks, and I haven't even done the Sticky/Wax charm effects. Wonder if anyone has ideas on how to present all that? :) -- [[User:Camomiletea|camomiletea]] 07:43, 31 May 2012 (UTC) | I've added a couple of notes on the effect of bases to the mice tables. Not completely happy with the way it looks, and I haven't even done the Sticky/Wax charm effects. Wonder if anyone has ideas on how to present all that? :) -- [[User:Camomiletea|camomiletea]] 07:43, 31 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | :Good addition, I've replaced the superscript numbers with traditional footnote reference symbols to avoid confusion... not sure if that's an aesthetical improvement though. [[User:Lamballs|Lamballs]] 16:37, 1 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Generals Locking bug == | ||
+ | |||
+ | The bug has been fixed, although some people can still encounter it - but once they do, it won't happen again. See [http://www.mousehuntgame.com/forum/showthread.php?67911-UNGUIDE-Iceberg&p=869716&viewfull=1#post869716 Michele's post here]. -- [[User:Camomiletea|camomiletea]] 16:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:18, 25 June 2012
Effect of Bases/Charms on Progress
I've added a couple of notes on the effect of bases to the mice tables. Not completely happy with the way it looks, and I haven't even done the Sticky/Wax charm effects. Wonder if anyone has ideas on how to present all that? :) -- camomiletea 07:43, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Good addition, I've replaced the superscript numbers with traditional footnote reference symbols to avoid confusion... not sure if that's an aesthetical improvement though. Lamballs 16:37, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Generals Locking bug
The bug has been fixed, although some people can still encounter it - but once they do, it won't happen again. See Michele's post here. -- camomiletea 16:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)