Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hunter's Hammer"
(Putting some sort of thought and order into the table) |
m (update links to MHdomain (no http required)) |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="8" style="border-collapse:collapse; text-align:left; margin:5px 0 5px 20px;" | {| border="1" cellpadding="8" style="border-collapse:collapse; text-align:left; margin:5px 0 5px 20px;" | ||
− | ! | + | ! To get |
− | ! | + | ! you have to smash |
|- | |- | ||
| [[DeathBot Parts]] | | [[DeathBot Parts]] | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | ::Any comments on the above? --[[User:Winelight|Winelight]] 14:50, 12 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::Merging common items together would make more sense, ie Obelisk Parts: OOI, OOS. Alphabetical order is good. Title can probably do with some improvement, too wordy now lol. Personally, I would go with 'Item' and 'Source'. Some shading would be nice too. That's the things that come into mind offhand. -- [[User:Grexx|Grexx]] 14:59, 12 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::::All sound good to me, especially the column headings, except the idea of merging common items, since it was confusion amongst hunters about how to make magic essence that led me to suggest splitting these rows in the first place! --[[User:Winelight|Winelight]] 15:08, 12 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::::I kept the merged items, but reworded the intro to the table to hopefully make it more clear that a user does not need to have [[Maki]] when all they want is to get [[Magic Essence]] from [[SUPER brie+|SB+]]. -- <span style="border:2px ridge #aaf;padding:1px 8px;font:normal 10px Verdana,sans-serif;">[[User:Ericb|ericb]] <sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Ericb|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ericb|contr]]</sub></span> 01:21, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Chrome Nannybot parts=== | ||
+ | Each Chrome Nannybot Part should get a separate line in the table -- see discussion above how having items merged is confusing. Additionally "Nannybot Parts" line already exists, and needs to have "Chrome Nannybot" added to the second column. -- [[User:Camomiletea|camomiletea]] 13:54, 3 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Done -- <span style="border:2px ridge #aaf;padding:1px 8px;font:normal 10px Verdana,sans-serif;">[[User:Ericb|ericb]] <sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Ericb|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ericb|contr]]</sub></span> 01:12, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Smashable question == | == Smashable question == | ||
Line 59: | Line 71: | ||
:There isn't enough information right now on what can be done with DeathBot parts. I'll try tomodify the wording. -- [[User:Camomiletea|Camomiletea]] 22:27, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | :There isn't enough information right now on what can be done with DeathBot parts. I'll try tomodify the wording. -- [[User:Camomiletea|Camomiletea]] 22:27, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Teddy Bear == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Should the Teddy Bear be in the table or in a separate section about how it was only smashable at first? -- 06:25 3 December 2009 (PST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Direct Link? == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Does anyone know of a URL that will take you directly to the Hunter's Hammer? Looking at the source for [{{MHdomain}}/crafting.php?tab=2 Crafting] doesn't give any hints, since the Hunter's Hammer link uses Ajax scripting rather than a new URL. -- <span style="border:2px ridge #aaf;padding:1px 8px;font:normal 10px Verdana,sans-serif;">[[User:Ericb|ericb]] <sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Ericb|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ericb|contr]]</sub></span> 13:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Finally learned it! Thanks to the library research selection page. -- <span style="border:2px ridge #aaf;padding:1px 8px;font:normal 10px Verdana,sans-serif;">[[User:Ericb|ericb]] <sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Ericb|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ericb|contr]]</sub></span> 01:30, 12 August 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 06:25, 11 February 2013
Nicely done on the page. But where are the new objects going to go? Does another table need to be added to the crafting pages? If so this may be helpful. Magic essence = "This substance is what gives SUPER|brie+ its magical properties. It can be used in a variety of recipes for unique results."--Delish 18:05, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Contents
Format of table
Firstly, to my mind, the table is the wrong way round. People don't want to know "Oh, I wonder what do I get if smash maki?", they want to know "Where do I get magic essence from?".
Secondly, attempting to roll up two different things in one line of the table is causing a spate of enquiries in the forum along the lines of "How do I make maki in order to smash it so I can get magic essence?", since it is not obvious that one line of the table is actually two different entries.
Thirdly, alphabetic order would be nice. Actually any sort of order would be nice. --Winelight 22:39, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
So what I would suggest is:
- Any comments on the above? --Winelight 14:50, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Merging common items together would make more sense, ie Obelisk Parts: OOI, OOS. Alphabetical order is good. Title can probably do with some improvement, too wordy now lol. Personally, I would go with 'Item' and 'Source'. Some shading would be nice too. That's the things that come into mind offhand. -- Grexx 14:59, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- All sound good to me, especially the column headings, except the idea of merging common items, since it was confusion amongst hunters about how to make magic essence that led me to suggest splitting these rows in the first place! --Winelight 15:08, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Chrome Nannybot parts
Each Chrome Nannybot Part should get a separate line in the table -- see discussion above how having items merged is confusing. Additionally "Nannybot Parts" line already exists, and needs to have "Chrome Nannybot" added to the second column. -- camomiletea 13:54, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Smashable question
Page currently states all smashable stuff can be rebuilt. Still true with smashable DeathBot? No time to research myself but wanted to point it out at least. -- B.Rossow talkcontr 22:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- There isn't enough information right now on what can be done with DeathBot parts. I'll try tomodify the wording. -- Camomiletea 22:27, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Teddy Bear
Should the Teddy Bear be in the table or in a separate section about how it was only smashable at first? -- 06:25 3 December 2009 (PST)
Direct Link?
Does anyone know of a URL that will take you directly to the Hunter's Hammer? Looking at the source for Crafting doesn't give any hints, since the Hunter's Hammer link uses Ajax scripting rather than a new URL. -- ericb talkcontr 13:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)