Difference between revisions of "Talk:Attraction Rate"
From MHWiki
(→More info needed: _ good / very good = @ 89%) |
(added my own attraction info, updated table) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:::::Just went through all the logs I ever saved and found this: I have two logs that state "very good" and are below 90% >> 135/151=89.4 and 99/111=89.189 ..... Plus: I also have a log which states "good" and has these figures >> 77/87=88.5 ..... This would mean that the switch from good to very good is @ 89% ..... Since I probably will try to gather tons of stale cheese I might find out about poor and very poor eventually ;] ____[[User:M.|_m.]] 21:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | :::::Just went through all the logs I ever saved and found this: I have two logs that state "very good" and are below 90% >> 135/151=89.4 and 99/111=89.189 ..... Plus: I also have a log which states "good" and has these figures >> 77/87=88.5 ..... This would mean that the switch from good to very good is @ 89% ..... Since I probably will try to gather tons of stale cheese I might find out about poor and very poor eventually ;] ____[[User:M.|_m.]] 21:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::::Went through my own logs. Unfortunately I only started keeping the summary about halfway through my collection, but I was able to confirm the difference between decent and good. I had a hunt with 59/79 = 74.68% Decent, and another with 48/64 = 75.00% Good -- [[User:Grexx|Grexx]] 04:51, 28 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Interim Attraction Rate Information == | == Interim Attraction Rate Information == | ||
| − | A quick list of the possible ways to display the information. Note that the information has not been verified. I'm thinking there might even be a term for 0% attraction rate. | + | A quick list of the possible ways to display the information. Note that the information has not been verified. I'm thinking there might even be a term for 0% attraction rate. |
| − | + | {| width="300" cellpadding="5" border="1" style="text-align:left; border-collapse:collapse; margin:0 20px 0 20px;" | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | {| width="300" cellpadding="5" border="1" style="text-align:left; border-collapse:collapse; margin | ||
! Attraction Message !! Attraction Rate | ! Attraction Message !! Attraction Rate | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 37: | Line 29: | ||
| Decent || 55% to <75% | | Decent || 55% to <75% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Good || 75% to < | + | | Good || 75% to <89% |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Very Good || | + | | Very Good || 89% to <98% |
|- | |- | ||
| Near Perfect || 98% to <100% | | Near Perfect || 98% to <100% | ||
| Line 45: | Line 37: | ||
| Perfect || 100% | | Perfect || 100% | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | What has been confirmed: | ||
| + | * Even lower ratings – ? | ||
| + | * Very Poor Floor – ? | ||
| + | * Very Poor Ceiling – ? | ||
| + | * Poor Floor – 47.10% current lowest | ||
| + | * Poor Ceiling < 55% Confirmed | ||
| + | * Decent Floor = 55% Confirmed | ||
| + | * Decent Ceiling < 75% Confirmed | ||
| + | * Good Floor = 75% Confirmed | ||
| + | * Good Ceiling < 89% Confirmed | ||
| + | * Very Good Floor = 89% Confirmed | ||
| + | * Very Good Ceiling – ? | ||
| + | * Near Perfect Floor – ? | ||
| + | * Near Perfect Ceiling < 100% | ||
| + | * Perfect Rating = 100% (not confirmed, but really what else can it be) | ||
| + | Note: Floor = Minimum, Ceiling = Maximum. | ||
Revision as of 04:51, 28 February 2009
More info needed
This page could use more info to justify it being a page of its own. -- B.Rossow talkcontr 19:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- Did a proper writeup for the page. There's still a few things I haven't added though, which I'll get to when I next remember this page exists :D
- I'm also in need of Attraction Rate details, mainly what % returns what message, although for a start I'm fairly certain that Poor < 65%, Decent < 80%, Good < 90%, Very Good < 95-98%, Almost Perfect < 100%, Perfect = 100%.
- I think poor <60%, but I'm not sure. Need lots of logs to verify that, though. Shinnok 11:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- From my log, the highest attraction rate I had that was still poor was 54.7%, and the lowest decent was 59.2%, so my guess is that it changes from poor to decent at around 55%. The lowest good I had was 77.6% and the highest was 88.7%, and I didn't have any very good yet - so I don't think I can come to any conclusions based on this data. Except that 77.6% is still good, not decent. Camomiletea 17:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the information, but Shinnok is right, a lot of logs are needed. I might just trawl through a couple of hundred or thousand player profiles to complete the information, or maybe start a thread asking for it. I'm pretty sure there's a "Very Poor" rating, possibly even worse. Will be quite tied up over the next few weeks though, so if someone else is willing to help compile the data I'll be more than happy :) If anyone does get to collecting the data, toss it into a text file and give a download link here so that others can double check the data. -- Grexx 18:38, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- From my Logs I have a lowest rate for Decent at 56.1% (46/82) and a highest rate for Poor at 54.9% (39/71). The lowest I have for Poor is 47.1% (33/70), but nothing recorded at lower than that.Twentypence 18:34, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Just went through all the logs I ever saved and found this: I have two logs that state "very good" and are below 90% >> 135/151=89.4 and 99/111=89.189 ..... Plus: I also have a log which states "good" and has these figures >> 77/87=88.5 ..... This would mean that the switch from good to very good is @ 89% ..... Since I probably will try to gather tons of stale cheese I might find out about poor and very poor eventually ;] _____m. 21:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Went through my own logs. Unfortunately I only started keeping the summary about halfway through my collection, but I was able to confirm the difference between decent and good. I had a hunt with 59/79 = 74.68% Decent, and another with 48/64 = 75.00% Good -- Grexx 04:51, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Interim Attraction Rate Information
A quick list of the possible ways to display the information. Note that the information has not been verified. I'm thinking there might even be a term for 0% attraction rate.
| Attraction Message | Attraction Rate |
|---|---|
| Very Poor? | 0% to <?% |
| Poor | ?% to <55% |
| Decent | 55% to <75% |
| Good | 75% to <89% |
| Very Good | 89% to <98% |
| Near Perfect | 98% to <100% |
| Perfect | 100% |
What has been confirmed:
- Even lower ratings – ?
- Very Poor Floor – ?
- Very Poor Ceiling – ?
- Poor Floor – 47.10% current lowest
- Poor Ceiling < 55% Confirmed
- Decent Floor = 55% Confirmed
- Decent Ceiling < 75% Confirmed
- Good Floor = 75% Confirmed
- Good Ceiling < 89% Confirmed
- Very Good Floor = 89% Confirmed
- Very Good Ceiling – ?
- Near Perfect Floor – ?
- Near Perfect Ceiling < 100%
- Perfect Rating = 100% (not confirmed, but really what else can it be)
Note: Floor = Minimum, Ceiling = Maximum.
