Difference between revisions of "Talk:Harpy Mouse"
From MHWiki
Camomiletea (talk | contribs) (→Effectiveness) |
(→Radioactive Blue?: new section) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:That does not mean normal effectiveness. Did you also have a miss against Harpy that did not have "less effective" message? "Less effective" only shows on a miss, and not on a catch. -- [[User:Camomiletea|Camomiletea]] 16:43, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | :That does not mean normal effectiveness. Did you also have a miss against Harpy that did not have "less effective" message? "Less effective" only shows on a miss, and not on a catch. -- [[User:Camomiletea|Camomiletea]] 16:43, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Radioactive Blue? == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Yesterday there was a ticker message about the Harpy being attracted to RB. Has anyone confirmed this? If it's true something should probably be mentioned in the article, but I'm hesitant to add it out of fear that it was some sort of April Fools joke. —[[User:MearsMan|<b><font color="#B22222">'''''MearsMan'''''</font></b>]] [[User talk:MearsMan|<font color="#008B8B"><sup><u>''talk''</u></sup></font>]] 03:11, 3 April 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:11, 3 April 2010
Pink Boxes
The harpy DOES leave us with a present for having a weak trap every time, doesn't it? Maybe we should add it here? Shinnok 02:01, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Effectiveness
3:00 in the evenin' I checked my trap and found that I had caught a mouse! I caught a 9 oz. Harpy mouse from the Lagoon worth 11,092 points and 3,109 gold.
I caught the Harpy with the Ambush trap and the Polar base. It apparently it has a normal effectiveness against the Harpy currently.
- That does not mean normal effectiveness. Did you also have a miss against Harpy that did not have "less effective" message? "Less effective" only shows on a miss, and not on a catch. -- Camomiletea 16:43, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Radioactive Blue?
Yesterday there was a ticker message about the Harpy being attracted to RB. Has anyone confirmed this? If it's true something should probably be mentioned in the article, but I'm hesitant to add it out of fear that it was some sort of April Fools joke. —MearsMan talk 03:11, 3 April 2010 (UTC)