Difference between revisions of "User talk:Camomiletea/Sandbox"
From MHWiki
(A thought.) |
Camomiletea (talk | contribs) (→Newbie help: reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Newbie help== | ==Newbie help== | ||
Personally, I really like the tabulated version for Novices. Its short and to the point! But for Masters, maybe the point to point discussion is needed. My version sounds a lot like a walk-through and I really prefer yours! [[User:Shinnok|Shinnok]] 06:42, 26 February 2009 (UTC) | Personally, I really like the tabulated version for Novices. Its short and to the point! But for Masters, maybe the point to point discussion is needed. My version sounds a lot like a walk-through and I really prefer yours! [[User:Shinnok|Shinnok]] 06:42, 26 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Yes, I also didn't like how the Master section came out. It just seems like in the beginning it makes sense to break it down by Hunter's title, but later on it is more sensible to break down by area. I read a bit of yours, and it has useful stuff, but yeah kinda wordy. That's what I was trying to do with the table -- to make it concise. [[User:Camomiletea|Camomiletea]] 03:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:02, 28 February 2009
Newbie help
Personally, I really like the tabulated version for Novices. Its short and to the point! But for Masters, maybe the point to point discussion is needed. My version sounds a lot like a walk-through and I really prefer yours! Shinnok 06:42, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I also didn't like how the Master section came out. It just seems like in the beginning it makes sense to break it down by Hunter's title, but later on it is more sensible to break down by area. I read a bit of yours, and it has useful stuff, but yeah kinda wordy. That's what I was trying to do with the table -- to make it concise. Camomiletea 03:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
