Difference between revisions of "Talk:Blueprints"
From MHWiki
m (→Ordering) |
Camomiletea (talk | contribs) (→Ordering) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::::I see well i dont really know the exact order so if you do feel free to edit it back.--[[User:Stinson|Tmm stinson]] 06:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | :::::I see well i dont really know the exact order so if you do feel free to edit it back.--[[User:Stinson|Tmm stinson]] 06:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I prefer alphabetical order to find the info easier. If chronological order needed, put it on History and Trivia part. Just my 2 cents [[User:Pus|Pus]] 14:18, 11 August 2009 (UTC). | :I prefer alphabetical order to find the info easier. If chronological order needed, put it on History and Trivia part. Just my 2 cents [[User:Pus|Pus]] 14:18, 11 August 2009 (UTC). | ||
| + | :There are so many blueprints that it would be easier to find what you are looking for using alphabetical order, than the order of introduction. Most of the articles in Wiki use alphabetical sorting too... -- [[User:Camomiletea|Camomiletea]] 15:22, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:22, 11 August 2009
Ordering
Should the blueprints be listed in order of appearance (giving a mini history of MH) or alphabetical order? It's somewhere in between right now. --Hyperchao 00:07, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- I say alphabetical--Tmm stinson 03:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Forgot to mention: I actually liked the chronological order. --Hyperchao 06:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- I think the orginal editor tried to make in alphabetical because it was just barely off so i fixed it. It can be changed. --Tmm stinson 06:27, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well different editors have used both approaches while adding the recent string of new blueprints, but the original article was in chronological order. Which is why I wanted to start the discussion. --Hyperchao 06:34, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- I see well i dont really know the exact order so if you do feel free to edit it back.--Tmm stinson 06:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well different editors have used both approaches while adding the recent string of new blueprints, but the original article was in chronological order. Which is why I wanted to start the discussion. --Hyperchao 06:34, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- I think the orginal editor tried to make in alphabetical because it was just barely off so i fixed it. It can be changed. --Tmm stinson 06:27, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Forgot to mention: I actually liked the chronological order. --Hyperchao 06:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- I prefer alphabetical order to find the info easier. If chronological order needed, put it on History and Trivia part. Just my 2 cents Pus 14:18, 11 August 2009 (UTC).
- There are so many blueprints that it would be easier to find what you are looking for using alphabetical order, than the order of introduction. Most of the articles in Wiki use alphabetical sorting too... -- Camomiletea 15:22, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
