Difference between revisions of "Talk:Records"
m (→Vanity: new section) |
Camomiletea (talk | contribs) (→Vanity) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
We've had lengthy discussions in the past about pointless vanity stuff being posted to the wiki. Is there a consensus from established editors that this page really belongs here? I just came across it and am disgusted by the idea. Showing off individual "accomplishments" is NOT what this wiki is for. -- [[User:Brossow|B.Rossow]] <sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Brossow|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Brossow|contr]]</sub> 16:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC) | We've had lengthy discussions in the past about pointless vanity stuff being posted to the wiki. Is there a consensus from established editors that this page really belongs here? I just came across it and am disgusted by the idea. Showing off individual "accomplishments" is NOT what this wiki is for. -- [[User:Brossow|B.Rossow]] <sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Brossow|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Brossow|contr]]</sub> 16:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :No, I don't think there was a consensus from established editors. Just someone from the forums thought it would be a good idea. *shrug* I don't see any harm in it, if it's just restricted to one page in the Wiki. At the same time, I wouldn't miss it if it's gone. -- [[User:Camomiletea|Camomiletea]] 17:02, 19 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:02, 19 August 2009
Heaviest catch Stat
I think the heaviest catch stat should be reintroduced to mousehunt.--Tmm stinson 04:29, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Updates
I am able to update the catches when the new updated lists come out.--Tmm stinson 06:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Best 36 Hour Log?
Should we add a "record" for the most gold and most points shown on a 36 hour log, or would that be too hard to determine? Moreover, would logs longer than 36 hours complicate the issue? (okay, duh, they would, but by how much?) --Dreamwalker 22:40, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- I like the idea and have added the idea. I have also created a group on the forums--Stinson 15:24, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Vanity
We've had lengthy discussions in the past about pointless vanity stuff being posted to the wiki. Is there a consensus from established editors that this page really belongs here? I just came across it and am disgusted by the idea. Showing off individual "accomplishments" is NOT what this wiki is for. -- B.Rossow talkcontr 16:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- No, I don't think there was a consensus from established editors. Just someone from the forums thought it would be a good idea. *shrug* I don't see any harm in it, if it's just restricted to one page in the Wiki. At the same time, I wouldn't miss it if it's gone. -- Camomiletea 17:02, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
