Difference between revisions of "Talk:Communities"

From MHWiki
(New page: == Discussion & rationale == Some of the so-called communities listed on the Main Page are hardly worthy of being included on this page, let alone have their own entry in the MHWiki. Whi...)
 
m (Discussion & rationale: expanded discussion)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Discussion & rationale ==
 
== Discussion & rationale ==
  
Some of the so-called communities listed on the Main Page are hardly worthy of being included on this page, let alone have their own entry in the MHWiki.  While some are truly notable (hundreds or even thousands of members, others have a relative handful at most.  In addition, the pages created here read more like 9th-grade fanboy pages than actual relevant content.  As such, I plan to tag many of said pages for deletion.  The groups can be linked from here with neutral descriptions (with none of the "biggest and funniest"-type of rhetoric) and a simple link to the Facebook group page.  This isn't the place for inside jokes, promoting a group, etc. People should be able to visit MHWiki and easil and quickly find relevant information without sorting through rubbish.  IMHO, of course. --[[User:Brossow|Brossow]] 00:37, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
+
Some of the so-called communities listed on the Main Page are hardly worthy of being included on this page, let alone have their own entry in the MHWiki.  While some are truly notable (hundreds or even thousands of members, others have a relative handful at most.  In addition, the pages created here read more like 9th-grade fanboy pages than actual relevant content.  As such, I plan to tag many of said pages for deletion.  The groups can be linked from here with neutral descriptions (with none of the "biggest and funniest"-type of rhetoric) and a simple link to the Facebook group page.  This isn't the place for inside jokes, promoting a group, etc. People should be able to visit MHWiki and easily and quickly find relevant information without sorting through rubbish.  IMHO, of course.
 +
 
 +
I propose that criteria be developed and followed for:
 +
#inclusion of a group on this page, and
 +
#creation of a separate page on MHWiki for detailed group info
 +
 
 +
Specifically, there should be a minimum number of group members (if entry links to a Facebook group) or a minimum number of active daily users (if entry links to a third-party website) before a group is listed or merits its own page.  The number I have in mind is 250 for listing here and 750 for a separate page.  Discussion?
 +
 
 +
--[[User:Brossow|Brossow]] 00:47, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:47, 17 December 2008

Discussion & rationale

Some of the so-called communities listed on the Main Page are hardly worthy of being included on this page, let alone have their own entry in the MHWiki. While some are truly notable (hundreds or even thousands of members, others have a relative handful at most. In addition, the pages created here read more like 9th-grade fanboy pages than actual relevant content. As such, I plan to tag many of said pages for deletion. The groups can be linked from here with neutral descriptions (with none of the "biggest and funniest"-type of rhetoric) and a simple link to the Facebook group page. This isn't the place for inside jokes, promoting a group, etc. People should be able to visit MHWiki and easily and quickly find relevant information without sorting through rubbish. IMHO, of course.

I propose that criteria be developed and followed for:

  1. inclusion of a group on this page, and
  2. creation of a separate page on MHWiki for detailed group info

Specifically, there should be a minimum number of group members (if entry links to a Facebook group) or a minimum number of active daily users (if entry links to a third-party website) before a group is listed or merits its own page. The number I have in mind is 250 for listing here and 750 for a separate page. Discussion?

--Brossow 00:47, 17 December 2008 (UTC)