Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cupid Mouse"

From MHWiki
(Loot)
(Bait: Adding some numbers)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Bait ==
 +
http://furoma.com/analytics/heart-of-the-tiger-party-party-party-4/ is my source for SB+ preference. -- [[User:Ralphminer|Ralphminer]] 13:04, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
:Suppose I'd better back that claim up. In our survey to 11th Feb, 64 Cupids were attracted out of 6,481 hunts (5,404 attractions) with Brie, 54 Cupids were attracted out of 743 hunts (720 attractions) with Super Brie. -- [[User:Twentypence|Twentypence]] 13:24, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 +
 
== Locations ==
 
== Locations ==
 
I believe, as per the usual locations of Event mice, they can probably be found in every location. -- [[User:Grexx|Grexx]] 17:40, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 
I believe, as per the usual locations of Event mice, they can probably be found in every location. -- [[User:Grexx|Grexx]] 17:40, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Line 37: Line 42:
 
There are dozens of similar reports on the forums.
 
There are dozens of similar reports on the forums.
  
I made no comments about frequency either.  If we find that the drops become more frequent over V-Day then we can mention it there.
+
I made no comments about frequency either.  If we find that the drops become more frequent over V-Day then we can mention it then.
 
--[[User:Heyyopat|Heyyopat]] 02:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Heyyopat|Heyyopat]] 02:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 +
''Note:  For clarity, this is not an argument about the earlier deletion.  This is simply stating why I changed the mouse page the second time, and how I corrected it by not mentioning the frequency of drops '''this time'''.  I don't care that the earlier post was deleted.  Thanks for your understanding''--[[User:Heyyopat|Heyyopat]] 03:31, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
:Actually, you did.  Your edit that Camomiletea [correctly] removed said this: "They are known to frequently drop [[SUPER brie+|SUPER|brie+]]." You new edit is fine, but you '''did''' mention frequency. --&nbsp;[[User:Brossow|B.Rossow]]&nbsp;<sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Brossow|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Brossow|contr]]</sub> 03:05, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
::From what has been announced previously, it is probably a 100% drop rate in line with the Valentine's day giveaway as announced [http://www.facebook.com/pages/MouseHunt-Rewards/24090019426?ref=ts here]. -- [[User:Grexx|Grexx]] 03:10, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
::You'll notice that on the page itself, it '''does not''' mention anything about frequency.  That is what is called a correction.  Thanks for pointing out what I said initially though, I guess that's important.--[[User:Heyyopat|Heyyopat]] 03:23, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:24, 12 February 2010

Bait

http://furoma.com/analytics/heart-of-the-tiger-party-party-party-4/ is my source for SB+ preference. -- Ralphminer 13:04, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Suppose I'd better back that claim up. In our survey to 11th Feb, 64 Cupids were attracted out of 6,481 hunts (5,404 attractions) with Brie, 54 Cupids were attracted out of 743 hunts (720 attractions) with Super Brie. -- Twentypence 13:24, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Locations

I believe, as per the usual locations of Event mice, they can probably be found in every location. -- Grexx 17:40, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Photo

I just caught it, so here's a snapshot: http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/1112/cupidxs5.jpg

Could someone with the knowledge of putting it into the wiki do that for me? I'm wiki-ignorant.--Kirbix 19:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Any chance you could provide the full-resolution image? That one is scaled down and we're trying to provide the highest resolution possible. In the meantime, this is much better than nothing, so thanks! :-) -- B.Rossow talkcontr 19:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Here; sorry, didn't think to make it high-res: http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/6489/cupidlk1.jpg --Kirbix 19:39, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! Interesting resolution on this one; all other mouse images have been 700x1050; this one is wider but not as tall (857x994). Strange.... -- B.Rossow talkcontr 19:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Kirbix: Not sure how you got that image (screen capture?), but I just checked and the original image is in fact 700x1050 like all the others. Please don't take it personally, but I've replaced the link to your image with one to a copy of the image directly from the MouseHunt server. -- B.Rossow talkcontr 16:14, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Loot

Apparently they sometimes drop SB+. Verified on http://apps.facebook.com/mousehunt/hunterprofile.php?snuid=23917124

1:51pm
I checked my trap and found that I had caught a mouse! I caught a 2 oz. Cupid mouse from the  Laboratory worth 874 points and 902 gold.
The mouse also dropped the following loot:
2 pieces of super brie cheese.

Camomiletea 20:17, 13 February 2009 (UTC)


2:59pm I sounded the Hunter’s Horn. I was successful in my hunt! I caught a 6 oz. Cupid mouse from the Dojo worth 870 points and 906 gold.

The mouse also dropped the following loot: 3 pieces of super brie cheese.

There are dozens of similar reports on the forums.

I made no comments about frequency either. If we find that the drops become more frequent over V-Day then we can mention it then. --Heyyopat 02:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Note: For clarity, this is not an argument about the earlier deletion. This is simply stating why I changed the mouse page the second time, and how I corrected it by not mentioning the frequency of drops this time. I don't care that the earlier post was deleted. Thanks for your understanding--Heyyopat 03:31, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Actually, you did. Your edit that Camomiletea [correctly] removed said this: "They are known to frequently drop SUPER|brie+." You new edit is fine, but you did mention frequency. -- B.Rossow talkcontr 03:05, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
From what has been announced previously, it is probably a 100% drop rate in line with the Valentine's day giveaway as announced here. -- Grexx 03:10, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
You'll notice that on the page itself, it does not mention anything about frequency. That is what is called a correction. Thanks for pointing out what I said initially though, I guess that's important.--Heyyopat 03:23, 14 February 2009 (UTC)