Difference between revisions of "Talk:Records"
Camomiletea (talk | contribs) (→Vanity) |
m (→Vanity: reply) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:No, I don't think there was a consensus from established editors. Just someone from the forums thought it would be a good idea. *shrug* I don't see any harm in it, if it's just restricted to one page in the Wiki. At the same time, I wouldn't miss it if it's gone. -- [[User:Camomiletea|Camomiletea]] 17:02, 19 August 2009 (UTC) | :No, I don't think there was a consensus from established editors. Just someone from the forums thought it would be a good idea. *shrug* I don't see any harm in it, if it's just restricted to one page in the Wiki. At the same time, I wouldn't miss it if it's gone. -- [[User:Camomiletea|Camomiletea]] 17:02, 19 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::The information on this page is useless. It only shows what's been reported by a tiny subset of players. I know that I have never reported and never will report any of my statistics like those shown here. I'm not the only one. If the information isn't verifiable, it shouldn't be here. And it's NOT verifiable as being the <whatever>-est because most players don't participate in the forums and don't care to show off their stats. The page should be deleted and any other existing vanity stuff should be removed without mercy. -- [[User:Brossow|B.Rossow]] <sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:Brossow|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Brossow|contr]]</sub> 17:33, 19 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:33, 19 August 2009
Heaviest catch Stat
I think the heaviest catch stat should be reintroduced to mousehunt.--Tmm stinson 04:29, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Updates
I am able to update the catches when the new updated lists come out.--Tmm stinson 06:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Best 36 Hour Log?
Should we add a "record" for the most gold and most points shown on a 36 hour log, or would that be too hard to determine? Moreover, would logs longer than 36 hours complicate the issue? (okay, duh, they would, but by how much?) --Dreamwalker 22:40, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- I like the idea and have added the idea. I have also created a group on the forums--Stinson 15:24, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Vanity
We've had lengthy discussions in the past about pointless vanity stuff being posted to the wiki. Is there a consensus from established editors that this page really belongs here? I just came across it and am disgusted by the idea. Showing off individual "accomplishments" is NOT what this wiki is for. -- B.Rossow talkcontr 16:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- No, I don't think there was a consensus from established editors. Just someone from the forums thought it would be a good idea. *shrug* I don't see any harm in it, if it's just restricted to one page in the Wiki. At the same time, I wouldn't miss it if it's gone. -- Camomiletea 17:02, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- The information on this page is useless. It only shows what's been reported by a tiny subset of players. I know that I have never reported and never will report any of my statistics like those shown here. I'm not the only one. If the information isn't verifiable, it shouldn't be here. And it's NOT verifiable as being the <whatever>-est because most players don't participate in the forums and don't care to show off their stats. The page should be deleted and any other existing vanity stuff should be removed without mercy. -- B.Rossow talkcontr 17:33, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
