Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mouse Group"
From MHWiki
m (→Specific Mouse Group pages: fixed a typo) |
Camomiletea (talk | contribs) (→Specific Mouse Group pages) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Specific Mouse Group pages == | == Specific Mouse Group pages == | ||
I'm thinking of creating pages for the different Mouse groups. Not just the Category pages, but actual pages like [[Elub Tribe]], [[Nerg Tribe]] and [[Derr Tribe]]. What you you people think? -- [[User:S18067|S18067]] <sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:S18067|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/S18067|contr]]</sub> 14:13, 10 July 2010 (UTC) | I'm thinking of creating pages for the different Mouse groups. Not just the Category pages, but actual pages like [[Elub Tribe]], [[Nerg Tribe]] and [[Derr Tribe]]. What you you people think? -- [[User:S18067|S18067]] <sup style='margin-right:-11px'>[[User_talk:S18067|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/S18067|contr]]</sub> 14:13, 10 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Honestly, I don't like it... I don't even like those existing [[Elub Tribe]], [[Derr Tribe]], [[Nerg Tribe]] articles. They simply repeat what can be found elsewhere... I don't know. For example I like [[Tribe]] which makes comparisons, makes a compilation of all the data relating to Tribes, but not the individual ones. I guess it would depend on what you plan to put into those articles. I feel that maybe instead of the separate articles, the Category pages should be expanded. If you have any extra information to put. Just one opinion, my 2 cents. -- [[User:Camomiletea|camomiletea]] 14:23, 10 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:23, 10 July 2010
Specific Mouse Group pages
I'm thinking of creating pages for the different Mouse groups. Not just the Category pages, but actual pages like Elub Tribe, Nerg Tribe and Derr Tribe. What you you people think? -- S18067 talkcontr 14:13, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- Honestly, I don't like it... I don't even like those existing Elub Tribe, Derr Tribe, Nerg Tribe articles. They simply repeat what can be found elsewhere... I don't know. For example I like Tribe which makes comparisons, makes a compilation of all the data relating to Tribes, but not the individual ones. I guess it would depend on what you plan to put into those articles. I feel that maybe instead of the separate articles, the Category pages should be expanded. If you have any extra information to put. Just one opinion, my 2 cents. -- camomiletea 14:23, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
